As we reported on April 29th, Charlie Spies, a TDS suffering and backstabbing attorney somehow slithered into the RNC but due to our reports here and others, he has been Fired -- according to President Trump Himself:
ORIGINAL April 29, 2024 ARTICLE:
Charles Spies, the current Chief Counsel of the Republican National Committee (not General Counsel) is a Never Trumper Ready to Stab Lara and the whole Trump family in the back.
Charles Spies and James E Tyrrell III wrote a classless letter to Alan Garten, then General Counsel to the Trump Organization, back on December 9, 2015, when Mr. Spies was counsel to the Right to Rise PAC, Inc.
While some people have come to appreciate President Trump after initial reservations, a person that can write the dribble that this demonic ass wrote simply cannot be trusted. Charlie’s December 2015 letter included the following:
“[W]e are intrigued (but not surprised) by your continued efforts to silence critics of your client’s campaign by employing litigious threats and bullying. Should your client [Donald Trump] actually be elected Commander-in-Chief, will you be the one writing the cease and desist letters to Vladimir Putin, or will that be handled by outside counsel? As a candidate for President, your client is a public figure and his campaign should, and will, be fact-checked. The ability to criticize a candidate’s record, policies and matters of public importance lies at the heart of the First Amendment, as courts have repeatedly recognized. If you have the time between bankruptcy filings and editing reality show contracts, we urge you to flip through the Supreme Court’s decision in New York Times v. Sullivan. If your client is so thin-skinned that he cannot handle his critics’ presentation of his own public statements, policies and record to the voting public, and if such communications hurts his feelings, he is welcome to purchase airtime to defend his record. After all, a wall can be built around many things, but not the First Amendment.
Lastly, in light of your confusion over the difference between Leadership PACs and Super PACs, we have to assume you may also be unaware of the FEC’s prohibition on a federal candidate’s use of corporate resources for campaign purposes. Although your client may think he is above the law and be accustomed to using lawsuits to bail out his failed business deals, the Federal Election Campaign Act and the FEC’s Regulations nonetheless apply to him and his campaign. Perhaps the attached complaint, filed today, will serve as a reminder of your client’s legal obligations under federal election laws. Just as your client is attempting to quickly learn the basics of foreign policy, we wish you personally the best in your attempts to learn election law.
Ironically, as a liberal, Charlie is of the party that has abused our First Amendment by silencing the voices of conservatives across social media --- how can he attack the President for this? As for his comments on foreign policy, how much crow would fit in his belly.
And here is some more background:
Lara needs to toss him out on his ear.🧵Introducing, Charlie Spies.
— GEORGE NEWS (@TheGeorgeHQ) April 9, 2024
1. In Sept 2016 he joined forces with his friend Mark Elias to condemn @realDonaldTrump as a threat to democracy, in response to Trump’s debate answer when asked if he would accept his loss.
2. In Sept - October 2016 Spies was calling Trump a…
Comments