Senate Liberals Blatantly Violate the Due Process Rights of Parents under the 14th Amendment

Each Senator Listed Here Has Chosen a Dark Path – All Need to Be Removed for their Evil Acts that violate Due Process and are funded through Earmarks.  The money they spend via earmarks are taxpayer funds.  These are applied to late term abortion (Reed, Whitehouse, Shaheen, Gillibrand) drag queens and burlesque performer services to youth, confidential care regarding sexual and mental health without parental permission (Casey), chest binders and tucking equipment without parental consent (Baldwin), LGBTQ youth advocacy in many cases for illegals, as well as in many cases, needle exchanges (Bennet, Schumer, Blumenthal, Murray, Heimlich, Booker, Markey).

The express references to the avoidance of parental permission in multiple of the listed earmarks would trigger Constitutional rights of Due Process for the parents of the children subjected to these various tortures.  The common theme of no parental notification implies a broader potential avoidance of any mandated parental approval where not expressly stated in clearly related earmarks.  Given this, all earmarks on these child LGBTQ transition and perversion matters should be investigated as to whether the organizations receiving the funds require informing parents prior to their mutilative and destructive acts on children.

As it is clear parents should have rights over the raising of their own child, and notice rights are only a sliver of what parents are owed, yet this is expressly denied by these insane Senators as they misguide our taxpayer money.  Senators are not permitted to fund Constitutionally illegal acts such as those obviously shown here.

As the Supreme Court stated in Troxel v. Granville 530 US 57 (June 5, 2000), “the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution did not permit a state to infringe on the fundamental right of parents to make child rearing decisions.”  See also Pierce v. Soc'y of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510, 534-35, 45 S. Ct. 571, 69 L. Ed. 1070 (1925) ("The child is not the mere creature of the state; those who nurture him and direct his destiny have the right, coupled with the high duty, to recognize and prepare him for additional obligations.")

If ever there was a time SCOTUS needed to make clear that taking away parents’ rights of notification regarding a child’s consideration to transition sexually via medical devices, medications and procedures, or receive counseling that seeks to motivate adoption of alternative genders under LGBTQ is expressly violative of the parents rights under the Due Process Clause with regard to their children.
Sign in to comment


Powered by StructureCMS™ Comments


Get latest news delivered daily!

We will send you breaking news right to your inbox

Copyright © 2024 Conservative - All Rights Reserved
Powered by